There is a difference between a bathing suit picture, and a picture where one is shown in undergarments such as painties and a bra. The coverage may be less in the swimsuit, but it is the knowledge that it undergarments that the subject is clothed in is what makes it an arousing picture.
Also, the position and angle of the girl and camera make it somewhat pornographic. You can see the folds in her panties that cover her, this showing he basic form in that region.
Lastly, I did not ask for this picture to be removed, but for it to have a mature content warning placed on it. I know the rules for this site say that you must be 13+, but so many people lie about this.
Also, many people do not wish to see this image. It can be seen in the sidebar of many photos, and many people I've come across have found this to be a particular annoyance to them as their art work would fall in the same category, but have the models fully dressed and not in a pose that could be considered erotic.
I'm sorry if I have offended you in anyway shape or form. I simply am trying to make this site a better and safer place for all of the people who have accounts on this site.
Sorry. There is no difference between wearing a bikini and underwear. I'm sorry your mind works that way, but you don't have to look at this photo and go EW PORN. Also, the folds on her nether regions? I see no wedgie. NONE. There are just realistic folds as any bathing suit or bikini would have. Again, it's not the artists problem if you look at this photo and automatically bring your mind to a dirty place. Get your head out of the gutter.
The lighting and the colours and the softness and...WOW! Just a beautiful piece. It's cute and sexy without being slutty and disgusting, kudos to you for finding such a balance. May even use this as a reference pose, will link you if I do